12/24/2010

Lowepro Inverse 200 AW Camera Beltpack (Black) Review

Lowepro Inverse 200 AW Camera Beltpack
Average Reviews:

(More customer reviews)
I purchased the Inverse 200 AW before a trip to Italy with my family.It held all of my electronic gear as a carry-on (SLR, 2 lenses, GPS, memory card holder, ipod and charger plus more). Once I arrived and emptied the non-camera gear, there was plenty of room for a small camcorder and my sunglasses so I didn't need a day-pack.I used it as a belt pack and shoulder bag depending on the location we were in and the folding flaps were quite useful there.

My biggest complaint is that the outside pouch is not very useful and makes the entire package more bulky than it needs to be.The pouch also houses the All-Weather cover which just adds to the bulk.

A minor complaint is that there is no string connecting the two zippers. It would be easier to open if you could grab a cord and open both at the same time.Closing it would be much easier as well.

All in all it's a great bag and could use some minor improvements in the next version.

Click Here to see more reviews about: Lowepro Inverse 200 AW Camera Beltpack (Black)

Product Description:
Ideal for the outdoor photo enthusiast and professional; the Lowepro Inverse 200 AW beltpack camera case offers a full set of thoughtful features to help you capture the moment with ease; protection and ultra comfort. The quick-access top lets you work out of your pack with minimal effort. A patented All Weather Cover provides serious protection from rain; sand and dust. The 3D contoured mesh lumbar belt distributes weight evenly; offers cushioned support and helps wick away moisture. A detachable and padded, 360-degree shoulder strap adds a comfortable, additional carrying option. Memory card pockets; an adjustable divider; mesh side pockets; exterior pockets; and SlipLock attachment loops let you organize your gear to suit your needs.

Buy NowGet 40% OFF

Want to read more honest consumer review about Lowepro Inverse 200 AW Camera Beltpack (Black) now ?

0 comments:

Post a Comment